How to end a debate with a liberal about President Donald Trump and “Russian collusion?” Well the quickest way, is to ask them in their own words, what exactly they think happened. Liberals are glued to their televisions and mainstream media sites, liberal blogs, NPR, etc. 24/7. They hear the issue repeated over and over, listening with glee, and yet…they aren’t informed enough to answer a simple question about what they think “Russian collusion” actually is. The biggest dummies of the bunch think that President Trump won because voting sites and polling machines were compromised. Well instead of using, my words to talk about how silly that is, I’ll use liberal hero Barack Obama. In this televised interview, he’s bashing Trump. But what you can use against liberals, is how he basically states that any idea that voting places on election day could be compromised was ridiculous. This video was posted on October 18th 2016 by NBC, prior to the election. Of course what we all know now, is that shortly after Donald Trump beat Hillary Clinton, Democrats could not accept defeat. So their backup plan to winning was, to blame “the Russians” for “meddling” in the election.
Most liberals think that President Trump was somehow working with Russia to hack Hillary Clinton, therefor having access to her emails that contained contaminating information. As soon as they go down this path, remind them that Hillary Clinton was using an unsecured server. What that means in a nutshell is, that the server wasn’t fit to have sensitive information exchanged from it. She was also using an email that didn’t end in .gov (which would have been secured.) Remember when the liberals said Hillary using an unsecured server or email wasn’t a big deal? Well it is. Want to know why? BECAUSE IT COULD BE HACKED! And it was. So what the media has brainwashed them to believe, is that it must have been the big bad Russians who hacked Hillary’s email so that Trump could win the election over Clinton. Because as we all know, the Russians want to destroy our country from within by…making the economy great, creating jobs and making peace with North Korea. Oh, wait…that actually has been good for the United States. Here’s what tiny brained liberals need to be informed of. Hillary’s server and email were UNSECURED. That means a twelve year old girl or boy who has read one of Hillary’s books could have guessed the name of her dog, street she grew up on, where she met her husband or any of those other security questions you have to ask when you get locked out of gmail or yahoo. Yes, it could have been that simple. I don’t have an advanced degree in cyber security, but I’m gonna guess that if a state run spy agency, you know, like the KGB, hacked the Secretary of State, they probably wouldn’t leave a note saying: “Loved the email content, Hillary. That John Podesta guy is such a character! Talk to you later, – the KGB.” What a state run hacking organization could do is hack you, and then send their IP address pinging to another location like North Korea, China or a Jimmy John’s in Brooklyn. The truth is, the FBI, CIA, DOJ, etc. don’t know exactly who hacked Hillary Clinton for sure. The only person who probably knows for sure is Julian Assange of Wikileaks. And Assange has stated that Russia was not the source of the leaked materials/emails from DAY ONE!
How did the hacking story get connected to Russia? During the primaries, media firm the Washington Free Beacon hired research firm Fusion GPS to get dirt on Trump. They were trying to derail Trump from becoming the Republican candidate for president. When they didn’t find enough incriminating evidence to stop him from becoming the Republican nominee, guess who picked up the tab after the Washington Free Beacon lost interest? Hillary Clinton and the DNC paid Fusion GPS to continue their investigation. Fusion GPS hired former MI6 spy, Christopher Steele to create what is now known as the “Russian Dossier or Trump Dossier.” Steele was (allegedly) told by sources in Russia that Donald Trump or people from within his organization were colluding with Russia to beat Hillary Clinton in the election. So, wait…what? Hillary Clinton and the DNC were paying spy Christopher Steele to tell Hillary Clinton and the DNC that Donald Trump was working with Russia to defeat HRC in the election. So I guess, if you’re being paid…are you going to say: “there’s nothing there” and stop being paid? Or are you going to keep looking for bread crumbs to keep those paychecks coming? Here’s where it gets even shadier. The DNC used the “Russian Dossier” to get probable cause and FISA warrants to basically spy on Donald Trump and look for real dirt. I don’t have a law degree, but this kind of seems like a major conflict of interest.
So after fake probable causes, illegal spying, two years gone by, millions of tax payer dollars and bullying potential witnesses to “cooperate” or as Jerome Corsi says: “lie” and what does Robert Mueller and the “Russian Collusion” investigation have? Well their smoking gun was 10 charges against Trump’s former campaign manager Paul Manafort for his dealings in…the Ukraine…before…he was on Donald Trump’s staff? Wait, what? How are Manafort’s crimes in the Ukraine tied to a “Russian” investigation? And why do people think Manafort’s charges are connected to Trump’s campaign if the charges were from BEFORE his time at Trump’s campaign? Good question. Now, I’m no geography wiz…so let me google a map real quick…well would you look at that (a tiny bit of sarcasm)? Someone needs to tell liberals that Russia and the Ukraine aren’t even the same country. As a matter of fact, half of the time they’re on the brink of war.
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/08/15/what-charges-does-paul-manafort-face.html
So what is the real “Russian Collusion?” Fake social media stories and accounts. What, really?! Yes, that’s why the DNC is so mad at Mark Zuckerberg and Facebook. They think social media websites like Facebook and Twitter need to police their sites better and eliminate fake pages. Like it’s their fault, there are trolls and bots. And before anyone even tries to argue that fake news and fake profiles were enough to change the outcome of an election, shut them down. Both parties have trolls. Any conservative who has debated topics on social media with other “people” has gone to their page to see a name like “Mike Smith” with no picture and only two friends. Then you feel stupid for arguing with them because you realize they are a fake troll getting a paycheck from George Soros.
https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2018/10/01/how-russia-helped-to-swing-the-election-for-trump
In closing, if I’m 100% incorrect and Robert Mueller announces tomorrow that they have found an email from Donald Trump to Vladimir Putin begging him to hack Hillary Clinton and give the information to Wikileaks, guess what? If Clinton had used a secured server, a secured email and didn’t have questionable content in her email, it wouldn’t have even been a story.
Hillary to prison presents: How to win an argument against a liberal. 